European Institute of Innovation and Technology hampered by “complex framework and management problems”, say EU auditors

The European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT), set up to bring together the worlds of education, science and business, is impeded in its effectiveness by a complex operational framework and management problems, according to a new report by the European Court of Auditors.

CompetitivenessWith a budget of €2.7 billion over the 2008-2020 period, the EIT aims to bring together creative and innovative partners from academia, research and business. Instead of financing projects directly, it provides grants to autonomous partnerships called Knowledge and Innovation Communities (KICs). The three KICs launched in 2010 include more than 500 partners across various disciplines, countries and sectors.

The auditors examined whether the EIT was an effective tool to foster innovation in the EU. While the main reasons for setting up the Institute were well-founded, they concluded that a number of important changes are needed.

“If the EIT wants to become the ground-breaking innovative institute it was originally conceived to be, significant legislative and operational adjustments are required to better foster the EU’s innovation potential”, said Alex Brenninkmeijer, the Member of the European Court of Auditors responsible for the report.

The auditors identified several weaknesses in key EIT concepts and processes.

  • The funding model includes KIC activities, not funded by the EIT. This is unnecessarily complicated and brings little to no added value;
  • The practical arrangements between the EIT and the KICs are poorly suited to innovation, in particular the way grants are paid;
  • The financial sustainability of the KICs is doubtful. Businesses are not involved enough and KICs’ declared income not coming from the EIT has not been substantial;
  • The performance indicators and the monitoring and reporting do not provide an informative picture of results and impacts.

Seven years after its inception, the EIT is still not fully operationally independent from the European Commission. This has hampered its decision-making, say the auditors. High staff turnover, including at senior management level, has limited the development of strategies and the efficiency of the EIT. The EIT is not the impact-driven institution which it was envisaged to be. The performance of the KICs is not sufficiently taken into account when the final payment of the grant is processed. The EIT has rarely rejected costs based on the lack of performance prior to 2015.

In light of their findings, the auditors recommend that the Commission should propose legislation to the European Parliament and Council to amend the EIT’s funding model. It should propose that certain funding conditions be removed, and that steps be taken to alleviate the operational and financial reporting burden of the KIC partners. They also recommend that the EIT itself should:

  • extend its grant agreement to cover more than a single calendar year, and ensure that grant agreements are concluded before activity begins;
  • focus once more on delivering impact by seeking greater autonomy and using the flexibility in the Horizon 2020 legislation, adopting specific rules tailored to the needs of the KIC partners and resolving its staffing issues to enable continuous monitoring of KICs’ performance; and
  • develop impact-based analysis and streamline its monitoring and reporting.

The purpose of this press release is to give the main messages of the special report adopted by the European Court of Auditors. The full report is on


Source: The European Court of Auditors